evidence for creationism

Merlinman2005 · #1 2006-05-03, 10:22

Le none.

The_Rabbi · #2 2006-05-03, 10:23

Technically, if God created everything, then everything is evidence for Creationism.

Apparently, there are dipshits on both sides of the argument.

[This message has been edited by The_Rabbi (edited 05-03-2006).]

Merlinman2005 · #3 2006-05-03, 10:34

No, then everything is the RESULT of Creationism.., not evidence. OMG, I made a universe, but can't create anything that makes it known that it was created by a guided hand, an intelligent being, not just pure chance. I guess they'll just have to figure it out for themselves.

If you want evidence, you'd have to have reasons why each thing, each material, exists.

kenwih · #4 2006-05-03, 10:36

can you say circular logic?

the truth is, the universe was blown out of the nose of a giant earwig. the existence of the universe proves it.

prove me wrong!

The_Rabbi · #5 2006-05-03, 10:39

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by Merlinman2005:

No, then everything is the RESULT of Creationism.., not evidence. OMG, I made a universe, but can't create anything that makes it known that it was created by a guided hand, an intelligent being, not just pure chance. I guess they'll just have to figure it out for themselves.

If you want evidence, you'd have to have reasons why each thing, each material, exists.

You are blind to the fact that we as humans simply cannot comprehend something like this. You will NEVER find convincing, conclusive evidence for either side. Unless there's something after you die, in which case it's a possibility.

As it stands, we just cannot and never will be able to understand it in our current form. There will always be a "why?" or "what came before that?"

I realize you very much want to believe and know that you're right, but I'm sorry, nobody knows and nobody will.

Merlinman2005 · #6 2006-05-03, 10:42

Earwigs could not have existed without a universe to support them... even a giant one. And if it was so huge, it's legs couldn't support its weight.

Proof Positive.

The_Rabbi · #7 2006-05-03, 10:44

Logically, God either necessarily exists or God does not necessarily exist.

God cannot not necessarily exist. Therefore, God necessarily exists.

But that logic doesn't do much good in the real world.

Merlinman2005 · #8 2006-05-03, 10:45

...and BTW, my remark was in response to Rabbi's claim that everything was evidence of Creationism.

And hey, chicken-fucker... how does that make me a dipshit?!

Uh-huh... hide behind the fact

"you can never understand... "

The_Rabbi · #9 2006-05-03, 10:47

^ Yes, it is a fact. You can't understand it. That means you'll never know if there is a God or if there isn't a God until you die. And if there isn't, you'll still never know.

It's just entirely pointless even thinking about unanswerable questions like this. Go get a girlfriend or something, enjoy life.

EDIT: Geez, I sound like a Buddhist.

[This message has been edited by The_Rabbi (edited 05-03-2006).]

kenwih · #10 2006-05-03, 10:48

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by The_Rabbi:

You are blind to the fact that we as humans simply cannot comprehend something like this. You will NEVER find convincing, conclusive evidence for either side. Unless there's something after you die, in which case it's a possibility.

As it stands, we just cannot and never will be able to understand it in our current form. There will always be a "why?" or "what came before that?"

I realize you very much want to believe and know that you're right, but I'm sorry, nobody knows and nobody will.

my point precisely. there is no evidence for god or creationism.