About
Community
News of the Temple
Community Bulletin Board
Chat
Art
Carnality
Entertainment
Science
Society
Technology
bbs | search | rss | faq | about | register
digg | del.icio.us | sphere | google

Go Back   Community > Society > My God Can Beat the Shit Out of Your God

My God Can Beat the Shit Out of Your God For discussing any and all religious viewpoints. Intolerance will not be tolerated. Keeping your sense of humor is required. Posting messages about theological paradoxes is encouraged.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Add WritingANovel to your ignore list  
Old 2009-01-11, 15:38
WritingANovel WritingANovel is online now
Regular
 
Ontario canada
Default Re: Guide on the Theistic argument

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarsCoban View Post

Isn't it ironic that the thing upon which your arguement seems to be founded, "being unable to perceive" ultimately, in a human, amounts to a "personal experience"?
It's just as well you used the word 'seems" here, because you were absolutely correct in that you were interpreting what he said (as opposed to taking it to literally mean what it exactly said). Brokeprophet's argument is grounded entirely in facts, which are: there exists no evidence that God exists. Therefore, for theists to claim that God exists, they arrive at such a conclusion through faith, not through science and/or logic. These are 1. factually correct; and 2. more importantly, actually do not deal with whether God exists or not. In other words, just because someone points out that the existence of God is grounded in faith but not science, it doesn't mean he's claiming the non-existence of God.

Also I don't think he said anything about personal experience, the ability to perceive and what not.

Quote:
Being unable to perceive a thing does not equal a things inexistence.
1. But brokephet never claimed that God doesn't exist in this thread (as far as I know)
2. You are right in that just because a person cannot perceive God through the senses it doesn't necessarily mean God does not exist, however, you must admit that evidence (as it is commonly understood to mean, none of that "LAWL we Christians have our own interpretation of this pre-existing English word such that it will mean whatever the hell we want it to, as to lend credence to whatever the hell we are claiming" shit, please), and the gathering of it, depend entirely on the senses. Given this, it is reasonable to say that there can exist no evidence in support of God. Given that there is no evidence (again, in the sense most people have understood it to mean, not in the special little way you theists have twisted it to mean) in support of God, and that people still believe in him, it can be said that they do so through having faith, and not through science/logic.

Last edited by WritingANovel; 2009-01-11 at 15:44.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:26.


 

 

totse.com certificate signatures
 
 
About | Advertise | Art | Carnality | Community | Contact Us | Copyright Policy | Entertainment | FAQ
Link to totse.com | Science | Search | Society | Submissions | Technology
Hot Topics
Covering the desert of Africa in solar panels
test thread
Is the hemp conspiracy really true?
LED lightbulbs
alternative fuel sources
Simple way to improve your gas mileage
Stop closing all the threads!
Ban plastic bags?
 
Sponsored Links
 
Ads presented by the
AdBrite Ad Network

 
Dawn Of The Dead
Dawn Of The Dead Poster
Buy at AllPosters.com